26.2 C
Monday, August 8, 2022

Featured News

নগাঁৱৰ গোমোঠাগাঁৱত ৯বস্তাকৈ চোৰাং শামুক উদ্ধাৰ

নিউজ ব্যুৰ',নগাঁও,৬আগষ্ট:--নগাঁও জিলাৰ ইটাচালী টাউন আৰক্ষী চকীৰ...

BTR CEM Pramod Boro Lauds NTPC GEM Initiative

On Friday, BTR CEM Pramod Boro interacted...

Supreme Court Rejects Arnab’s request to Transfer Cases From Maharashtra Police to CBI

English NewsSupreme Court Rejects Arnab’s request to Transfer Cases From Maharashtra Police to CBI

The Supreme Court on Tuesday, 19 May, rejected a request by Republic editor in chief Arnab Goswami, to transfer the investigations into the cases against him for spreading communal hatred to the CBI from the Maharashtra Police.

On 11 May , Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah had reserved their judgment on the pleas by Goswami, to transfer the FIRs filed against him regarding his shows on the Palghar lynching and Bandra migrant gatherings – originally he had asked for the cases to be quashed as they were allegedly an attempt to silence him as a journalist.

In the judgment by Justice DY Chandrachud, the apex court today emphasised the importance and standing of freedom of the press but noted this was not “absolute”. As a result, the court declined to quash the main FIRs against Goswami.

However, as there were multiple identical FIRs against Goswami regarding the Palghar lynching in various states, the court agreed to quash all of those except the one currently being investigated in Mumbai.

On the issue of transferring the case from the Maharashtra Police to the CBI, the judges held that there was clear precedent that the police have the right to investigate these cases. If Goswami wants to get them quashed, he can follow the regular process, ie approach the Bombay High Court.

In the meanwhile, Goswami’s interim protection from arrest has been extended for another three weeks during which time he can seek an appropriate remedy.

Chilling of Free Speech or Preventing Spread of Communal Hatred?

Goswami had filed petitions relating to both the FIRs after they’d been lodged against him, seeking their quashing. On the first day of hearing, on 24 April, the apex court had stayed all the FIRs regarding the Palghar lynching in states outside Maharashtra, while granting Goswami interim protection from arrest.

The second date of hearing, on 11 May, had seen him ask for the quashing of both FIRs, but after the judges indicated this request should be made to the Bombay High Court, his lawyer, senior advocate Harish Salve, request that the investigation be transferred to the CBI instead.

The hearing, conducted via video conferencing, saw Salve, representing Goswami, allege that this was a case of “one political party targeting a journalist.” He also noted with alarm that one of the police officers who had interrogated Goswami had now tested positive for COVID-19, questioning the bona fides of the investigation process, and that this kind of case could have a chilling effect on free speech.

He noted that Goswami had “made serious allegations against the local police” in his programmes (a point which had been raised in the Maharashtra government’s application to the court), and so said he would not have a problem if the cases were transferred to the CBI for investigation.

This led to a sharp exchange between senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the State of Maharasthra, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, and Salve. Sibal contested the transfer of the case to the CBI, alleging this meant the investigation would be in Goswami’s hands as a result.


Check out our other content

Check out other tags:

Most Popular Articles

error: Content is protected !!
%d bloggers like this: